İçeriğe atla
Deeplomap
Hikayeler
US
Gelişiyor

Trump'tan İran Anlaşması İçin Kongre Denetimi Sinyali

Özet · AI üretimi

ABD Başkanı Donald Trump, Fransa'da Birleşik Arap Emirlikleri Devlet Başkanı Muhammed bin Zayid Al Nahyan ile yaptığı görüşme sırasında, yeni müzakere edilen İran anlaşmasını Kongre denetimine sunmaya sıcak baktığını belirtti. Salı günü yaptığı açıklamada Trump, anlaşmanın şartlarının yakından korunduğu bir dönemde, her iki partiden yasa yapıcıların detaylara erişim talebine yanıt olarak bu sinyali verdi. Anlaşmanın tam metni henüz kamuoyuyla paylaşılmazken, Kongre üyeleri inceleme yetkisi talep ediyor. Trump'ın bu hamlesi, başkanlık yetkileri ile yasama denetimi arasındaki dengeyi ve İran ile yürütülen diplomatik sürecin şeffaflığını öne çıkaran bir gelişme olarak değerlendiriliyor.

Başlangıç 16 Haz 17:50 15 olay Güncellendi 2 sa önce
ABD dosyası →
Paylaş
Bağlam · AI üretimi

Bağlam, hikayenin etrafındaki ülke + lider + komşu hikaye ağına dayanılarak AI tarafından üretildi. Olgu içerikleri için her zaman üstteki kaynak linklerine başvurun.

Bu gündemi takip et

ABD gelişmelerini kaçırma — ücretsiz kaydol, günlük brifinginde gör.

Zaman çizelgesi

en güncel: 2 sa önce
  1. Güvenlik16 Haz 17:50

    Trump open to congressional review of Iran deal as lawmakers seek details

    Washington, ABD

    WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump on Tuesday signalled his willingness to submit the recently negotiated Iran agreement to Congress for review, as lawmakers from both Republican and Democratic lawmakers demanded access to a deal whose full terms remain closely guarded. Speaking during a meeting with United Arab Emirates (UAE) President Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan in France, Trump suggested he had no objection to congressional scrutiny of the accord, which was announced over the weekend and is expected to formally be signed in Geneva on Friday by Vice President JD Vance. “What I would like to do is send it to Congress and say, ‘You shouldn’t approve it.’ And they will approve it,” Trump said, appearing to joke about the review process. The agreement, signed electronically on Sunday by Trump and Vice President JD Vance, is designed to end four months of military confrontation between Washington and Tehran and reopen the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz. But the administration has yet to release the text of the memorandum of understanding, leaving lawmakers uncertain about the future of Iran’s nuclear programme, sanctions relief and verification mechanisms. The secrecy surrounding the accord has triggered demands for greater transparency on Capitol Hill, where memories remain fresh of the bruising debate over the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) negotiated by President Barack Obama. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said lawmakers lacked sufficient information to judge the agreement. “I don’t know enough about it to say” whether it is a good deal, Thune told reporters. “My understanding of what it entails — again, not having seen anything — I think the issues are going to be compliance and, ‘How you’re going to enforce that and what are the financial incentives the Iranians are going to have from our country?’” Republicans broadly welcomed the apparent diplomatic breakthrough, but several made clear that support would depend on the final details. Senator Lindsey Graham, one of Trump’s closest allies in Congress, called for lawmakers to be given the opportunity to examine the agreement before endorsing it. “The MoU, I want to see it myself. The way Iran describes it is awful. The way we describe it makes sense to me. Let’s look at it and see what it actually is,” Graham said. In a separate statement, he noted that any nuclear agreement with Iran would ultimately require congressional review and approval. “Under our law, any nuclear deal with Iran will be sent to Congress for review and a vote. I look forward to reviewing the final product,” he said, adding that Vice President Vance and other negotiators should personally brief lawmakers. The unease among some Republicans has been reinforced by analyses suggesting that the war failed to achieve its original objective of fundamentally weakening the Iranian state. Writing in Foreign Affairs, Narges Bajoghli and Vali Nasr argued that “the war’s initial aim — to deliver a death blow to the Islamic Republic — has proved unattainable.” Instead, they wrote, “rather than breaking Iran, the crucible of war has transformed it in unanticipated ways.” Such assessments have added to concerns among conservatives who fear the administration may eventually settle for a framework that leaves key elements of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure intact while providing Tehran with significant economic relief. Democrats, meanwhile, welcomed efforts to end the conflict but sharply criticised the administration’s decision to go to war in the first place. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer urged the White House to provide a full briefing to Congress and questioned the overall wisdom of the military campaign. “There are still many unknowns about Trump’s negotiations with Iran. But we know this for certain: we are worse off than before Trump began this foolish war of choice,” Schumer said. Senator Jack Reed, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, argued that the proposed agreement appeared to offer fewer restrictions on Iran’s nuclear programme than the Obama-era accord that Trump abandoned during his first term. “So, we have spent billions of dollars. We’ve lost 14 personnel killed in action, hundreds wounded, and we’ve disrupted the world economy. And we’re getting basically less than what we had under the JCPOA, which President Trump walked away from,” Reed told Fox News. Representative Seth Moulton, a member of the House Armed Services Committee, was even more blunt, describing the emerging arrangement as “basically a surrender document” from Trump to Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei. “$100 billion of taxpayer money already put into this war, 14 Americans dead, and we get a deal that just reopens the strait that was already open before he started the war? How is that a win?” Moulton asked. The Trump administration maintains that the agreement represents a significant diplomatic success, ending hostilities and restoring maritime traffic through one of the world’s most important energy corridors. Yet many of the most contentious questions — including the fate of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile and the scope of sanctions relief — appear to have been deferred to follow-on negotiations expected over the next 60 days. That uncertainty has left both supporters and critics awaiting details of a deal that could soon become the subject of a major congressional battle.

    Dawn – Home
  2. Güvenlik16 Haz 18:36

    Lawmakers in the dark on Iran deal as Trump says he will send it to Congress

    Washington, ABD

    By Patricia Zengerle WASHINGTON, June 16 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he was willing to send his interim deal to end the war with Iran for review by the U.S. Congress, as lawmakers, including many of his fellow Republicans, said they were largely in the dark about the pact. The U.S.-Iran agreement, announced on Sunday, has spurred optimism that a conflict that has killed thousands and disrupted the global economy will soon end.

    Al-Monitor – The Pulse of the Middle EastThe Straits Times – WorldThe Straits Times – World
  3. Diplomatik17 Haz 04:05

    Look who’s losing it over Trump’s Iran deal

    Washington, ABD

    When Trump launched a war against Iran in late February, his MAGA movement suddenly became nearly indistinguishable from the neoconservative foreign policy Trump once abhorred. For nearly four months, Washington hawks like Senator Lindsey Graham and radio jock Mark Levin were riding high. But over time it became clearer that the president was looking for a way out and now the president has reportedly reached a memorandum of understanding with Iran to end the fighting, open the Strait of Hormuz, and to keep talking. Trump’s friends, who were hoping for Iranian capitulation and regime change, even if that meant indefinite bombing and blockading, aren’t very happy today. Levin appeared to be in despair on his Fox News Sunday night program, insisting that Congress must approve of any Iran deal (Levin never cared that Congress wasn’t consulted to go to war). “It won’t stand,” he ranted. “It won’t stand for long even during the Trump presidency. Israel will not be able to adhere to what would be a suicide pact!” Levin even tussled with a Trump adviser over the deal. A frustrated Ben Shapiro of The Daily Wire demanded the release of the memorandum. “Here's the amazing thing about written agreements: they are comprised of words we can all read and then form opinions about! It's really neat!” “So release the MOU text. Now,” he stormed. “This is a very bad deal for the United States,” groused former National Security Advisor John Bolton. He taunted his old boss. “They’ve played him like a violin. That’s why they’ve got the deal that they want.” Bush-Cheney alumni Marc Theissen dismissed it as “the Vance deal,” referring to the Vice President. Sen. Graham was reportedly “skeptical” of the deal and then got rather passive-aggressive. “Under our law, any nuclear deal with Iran will be sent to Congress for review and a vote,” he posted on X. “I look forward to reviewing the final product and I believe it is imperative that the architect of the deal, Vice President Vance and his negotiating partners, be part of the process in presenting the final deal to Congress," he added.” Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) warned that “dark forces are trying to break the American-Israeli alliance.” Presumably one of those “dark forces” is the president for wanting a deal? The habitually hawkish Erick Erickson rolled out the shopworn smears. “The racists and antisemites support the Iran deal,” he posted on X. To which independent journalist Glenn Greenwald responded , “once again, the pro-Israel right has no discourse other than to scream RACIST and ANTI-SEMITE at everyone who disagrees with them.” Notice that with the exception of perhaps Bolton, none of these critics are going after Trump directly. They talk about betraying Israel, antisemitism, or they blame Vance. “I feel very sad for the protestors in Iran who lost their lives,” a clearly distraught Laura Loomer posted. “Nearly 100,000 innocent people slaughtered this year in Iran by the Iranian regime and IRGC.” There is no evidence that 100,000 Iranians were killed in the protests, but that is besides the point, the idea that this war was to liberate Iranians was exposed as farce as soon as bombs started falling on Tehran, killing civilians including 120 schoolchildren, on Feb. 28. Former George W. Bush Administration mouthpiece Ari Fleischer shared Loomer’s post. “I still don’t trust Iran,” he also wrote, as if absolute trust in any country is a requirement for diplomatic agreements. “Trust but verify” Ronald Reagan once said to his critics. Meanwhile Zionist evangelical preacher John Hagee declared that “no deal is better than a bad deal.” Trump’s own U.S. ambassador to Israel and Evangelical Zionist Mike Huckabee appeared to defy the president or at least undermine the deal. “Without Israel, there would not be an America. We owe our very existence to what happened in this land.” To remind everyone, Israel’s government was founded in 1948 and the United States celebrates its 250th birthday on July 4. There are more examples of the meltdown of course, but no need to overwhelm the reader. This episode was probably summed up best by Vice President Vance, who reportedly said on Tuesday of his administration’s current critics like Mark Levin and others: "It is kind of ironic that they’re really, really worried about stopping this thing when they were so gung-ho about starting this thing." Yes they are. And yes they were.

    Responsible Statecraft
  4. Güvenlik17 Haz 16:25

    Son Dakika... Trump'tan 'İran'la anlaşma' çıkışı: '60 gün içinde tamamlanmazsa...'

    ABD

    ABD Başkanı Trump, İran ile anlaşmaya ilişkin "60 gün içinde tamamlanmazsa bombalamaya geri döneriz" dedi.

    Cumhuriyet – Dünya
  5. Güvenlik17 Haz 16:41

    Trump: Anlaşma 60 günde tamamlanmazsa bombalamaya döneriz

    ABD

    ABD Başkanı Donald Trump, G7 Zirvesi kapsamında yaptığı açıklamalarda İran ile imzalanması beklenen anlaşmanın bir mutabakat zaptı niteliğinde olduğunu belirterek, sürecin 60 gün içinde tamamlanmaması halinde askeri seçeneğin yeniden gündeme gelebileceğini söyledi. ABD Başkanı Donald Trump, İran ile yürütülen diplomatik sürece ilişkin dikkat çeken açıklamalarda bulundu.

    Milliyet
  6. Güvenlik17 Haz 22:28

    Top Republican decries Trump’s Iran deal: ‘Reagan is rolling over in his grave’

    Washington, ABD

    Senator Bill Cassidy attacks ‘worst foreign policy blunder in decades’ while others in his party skeptical over peace deal A handful of Senate Republicans have sharply criticized the agreement Donald Trump reached with Iran, accusing the administration of committing “the worst foreign policy blunder in decades”. On Wednesday, the Trump administration released the text of an interim deal between Washington and Tehran to end the 110-day conflict, framing it as a “major win” for the US – even as the 14-point accord made significant political and financial concessions to Iran to reopen the strait of Hormuz and prevent a “worldwide depression”. Continue reading...

    The Guardian – World
  7. Güvenlik18 Haz 09:44

    US media slam Trump's 'spin job' over Iran war deal

    Washington, ABD

    WASHINGTON: Pre-war objectives abandoned, Iran’s power bolstered, tens of billions of dollars guzzled away: US media appear unanimous in condemning Donald Trump’s concessions to Iran in a deal meant to end the war.

    New Straits TimesFree Malaysia Today
  8. Diplomatik18 Haz 09:54

    Trump ended his idiotic Iran war. Good.

    Washington, ABD

    I have spent years fighting against Trump’s push toward war with Iran, and I have the scars to prove it. When Trump withdrew from the JCPOA in 2018, I warned that it would eventually bring us to this moment. Ever since, I have consistently argued against the confrontational path he set the United States on. That record speaks for itself, which is why I can say what follows without any throat-clearing. Given the circumstances, President Trump’s decision to strike a deal with Tehran and bring this costly, unnecessary war to an end is the right one. It deserves support, not partisan second-guessing. As Rob Malley — a key member of Barack Obama’s team that negotiated the nuclear deal and later Joe Biden’s lead negotiator with Iran — noted on X, comparing Trump’s memorandum of understanding to Obama’s JCPOA misses the point. What matters is not how the agreement stacks up against past diplomatic achievements, but how it compares to the alternatives before us. And on that score, Malley argued, the MOU is “far preferable to any of the alternatives on offer. Period.” I would go further. To examine the Memorandum of Understanding and ask “Was the war worth it?” is nonsensical. Of course it wasn’t. How could it have been? The premise itself is deeply flawed: that a failed war of choice would somehow strengthen Washington’s hand at the negotiating table and produce more favorable terms. History offers little support for such a proposition. The question is also flawed in another, more consequential way. It implies that a war should not be brought to an end until it has produced better terms — even when the war itself is failing. Taken seriously, that logic leads to a dangerous conclusion: that a failed war must continue until the battlefield fortunes somehow improve and a more favorable outcome becomes attainable. Perhaps that day will come. Perhaps it never will. In the meantime, the costs — in lives, treasure, regional stability, and strategic credibility — are treated as secondary considerations. This is how endless wars are born. Wars become interminable when leaders convince themselves that ending them without victory is politically more costly than continuing them without hope. Once that trap is sprung, every setback becomes an argument for one more deployment, one more escalation, one more year. The objective shifts from achieving a realistic political outcome to avoiding the admission that the original objectives were unattainable. American history offers more than a few examples. Presidents inherit wars they did not start, recognize they cannot be won on the promised terms, yet lack the political space to end them. So they postpone the reckoning. They kick the can down the road, handing the burden to their successor, who does the same. The result is a cycle of strategic drift in which the costs accumulate while the prospects for success steadily recede. When victory is nowhere in sight, prolonging a conflict in the hope that reality will eventually conform to political rhetoric is not resolve. It is denial. Remember Afghanistan. For years, American officials lied to the public that victory was just around the corner — six months away, perhaps a year at most. Yet the Afghanistan Papers later revealed that these officials privately understood that victory was nowhere in sight. They knew the war was adrift, but feared the political consequences of admitting it. So the war continued. By the time the United States finally withdrew, nearly two decades had passed, and more than $2 trillion had been spent. And what was the end result? After twenty years of war, thousands of American and allied lives lost, and hundreds of thousands of Afghan casualties, the United States arrived back where it had begun: it had replaced the Taliban with the Taliban. That is the curse of endless war. The refusal to accept an unfavorable reality today merely guarantees a higher bill tomorrow. Some credit must be given to Trump for breaking this pattern, even as he should be blamed for having started this war in the first place. Political leaders should be judged not only for the mistakes they make, but also for whether they have the courage to correct them. Trump could have followed the well-worn path of his predecessors. He could have prolonged the conflict, spent more money, sacrificed more lives, destabilized more economies, and further depleted American power — all while insisting that victory remained just over the horizon. Recall the countless times he declared that the war had been won. Indeed, the political costs of continuing the war would likely have been lower than the costs he is paying today for ending it. In American politics, there is often greater punishment for acknowledging failure than for perpetuating it. That perverse incentive has trapped presidents for decades. In his testimony on the Vietnam War before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1966, George Kennan stated the following: “There is more respect to be won in the opinion of the world by a resolute and courageous liquidation of unsound policies than by the most stubborn pursuit of extravagant or unpromising objectives.” The criticism coming from some Democrats is particularly disappointing because it echoes the same bad-faith tactics Republicans deployed against the JCPOA in 2015. To be sure, Trump has invited some of this treatment. He spent years attacking Obama’s agreement with a barrage of misleading arguments and exaggerated claims. But that does not make it wise for Democrats to return the favor. Trump currently owns this failed war, but if the Democrats help torpedo the MOU and war resumes, then they will co-own the next war. Trump’s disaster will become theirs as well. This isn’t rocket science. Several Democratic lawmakers have managed to criticize the war, hold Trump accountable for it, yet avoid attack lines that could sabotage the MOU. Their criticisms are primarily over Trump having started this war in the first place, rather than the terms for ending it. Rather than attacking the terms of the MOU, Democrats should pressure the administration to protect it from those who are determined to see it fail. The main external threat is the Israeli government and Benjamin Netanyahu’s obsession with sabotaging any opportunity for Iran and the United States to bury the hatchet. Instead of relying solely on angry phone calls and public rebukes of Netanyahu, supporters of ending the war should press Trump to act now: suspend military aid to Israel and curtail military and intelligence cooperation. Such measures would limit Israel’s ability to reignite the conflict and dispel any notion in Tel Aviv that Washington will automatically follow Israel into another war. If Israeli leaders understand that the United States will not be drawn into a future conflict on their behalf, their incentive to start one in the first place will be significantly reduced. The task now is not to reward Trump politically, nor to excuse the recklessness that produced this war. It is to prevent the war from returning. Democrats can condemn the decision to start it without sabotaging the agreement that ends it. They can hold Trump accountable without helping Netanyahu drag the United States back into conflict. The choice before them is not between opposing Trump and supporting peace. It is between learning from America’s endless wars and repeating them. This article was republished from Trita Parsi's Substack

    Responsible Statecraft
  9. Güvenlik18 Haz 14:57

    Trump's Iran deal sparks anger among Republican hawks

    Washington, ABD

    WASHINGTON - United States President Donald Trump's deal with Iran has opened a rare breach with Republican hawks, who warn that the agreement falls far short of the sweeping victory he promised and could leave Tehran richer, stronger and still able to threaten the region.

    Bangkok Post – WorldThe Hindu – International
  10. Güvenlik18 Haz 15:19

    Vance warns Israeli critics over Iran deal: Trump is your only ally

    Washington, ABD

    WASHINGTON, June 18 - U.S. Vice President JD Vance lashed out at Israeli critics of the Iran deal on Thursday, saying President Donald Trump is Israel's only ally in a sharp rebuke that referenced the billions in U.S. defense aid the country receives.

    The Straits Times – WorldChannel NewsAsia – Latest NewsThe Express Tribune – LatestThe Guardian – World
  11. Güvenlik18 Haz 19:36

    Republicans blast Trump's Iran agreement as details emerge

    Washington, ABD

    By Patricia Zengerle and Nathan Layne WASHINGTON, June 18 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's interim deal to end the Iran war met scorching public criticism from some of his fellow Republicans as copies of the signed agreement circulated on Capitol Hill on Thursday. One Republican senator called the framework pact announced this week the "worst foreign policy blunder in decades," another said some reported provisions seemed "ill-advised," and some pro-Republican commentators also broke with Trump over the agreement.

    Al-Monitor – The Pulse of the Middle EastThe Straits Times – WorldDefense NewsArmy Times – Home+3 kaynak daha
  12. Güvenlik18 Haz 19:51

    Gas prices fall below $4 on average after Trump’s signing of Iran deal to end war

    Washington, ABD

    Drivers feel some relief but prices still a dollar more per gallon overall since before US-Israel attack on Iran Sign up for the Breaking News US newsletter email The average price of US gasoline fell to just under $4 a gallon on Thursday for the first time since March, following the announcement of a preliminary agreement between the US and Iran to end the war and reopen the strait of Hormuz. The development has provided some relief to drivers who have seen soaring costs amid Washington’s war with Iran. But filling up still remains more expensive than it was before the conflict began. Continue reading...

    The Guardian – World
  13. Güvenlik18 Haz 20:44

    Trump administration compares reflecting pool algae battle to Iran war

    Washington, ABD

    Interior department insists water at Washington landmark is ‘crystal clear’ as witnesses report murky green pool US federal government workers continue take on the green hue that has swept across Washington’s reflecting pool, an increasingly fiendish battle the Trump administration compared to its war with Iran. After Donald Trump ordered a $14.2m refurbishment to turn the monument “American Flag blue” in time for the country’s 250th birthday celebrations, the administration encountered a formidable foe: algae. Continue reading...

    The Guardian – World
  14. Güvenlik19 Haz 02:42

    Trump'tan İran açıklaması: Tek bir geminin bile geçemediği bir deniz ablukası uyguladı

    ABD

    ABD Başkanı Donald Trump, İran'ı askeri açıdan tamamen mağlup ettiklerini belirterek, Hürmüz Boğazı'nda uygulanan abluka için "Başka kim böyle bir abluka uygulayabilirdi ki? Tek bir geminin bile geçemediği...Devamı için tıklayınız

    Sabah – Dünya
  15. Güvenlik20 Haz 06:37

    In 'Trump Heights', Israelis have not abandoned US president despite Iran deal

    Washington, ABD

    As the sound of Israeli artillery shells echoed around their hilltop homes close to Lebanon, residents of Trump Heights struggled to hide their dismay at the deal to end the war on Iran, but were not giving up on their hero in the White House. Under the US-Iran agreement announced earlier this week to end the Middle East war, fighting is also supposed to cease between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon. In Israel, the agreement is widely viewed as undermining the country’s security and its acceptance by Washington as a strategic failure for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. In Trump Heights, a community of small prefabricated homes perched on a hilltop just 15 kilometres from the Lebanon border, the deal with Iran has not proved popular with residents. But for those living in the settlement, named in homage to the US president, the agreement was not cause to completely abandon their community’s namesake. “We give President Trump the benefit of the doubt that he is making the right decisions for America, and that he is also trying to help his allies — and, of course, the most important ally in the region is Israel,” said 32-year-old Shlomo Schlechter. But “we understand that American and Israeli interests do not always go hand in hand,” the law student said, adding that he still trusted the US president to make the right decision as the deal’s details are hashed out over the next 60 days. Like other residents AFP spoke to, Schlechter said he did not expect the deal to hold, nor Israel to withdraw from Lebanon. “We hope that President Trump will remain firm, and when he sees that the Iranians are not serious — as I expect will happen — he will return and know how to deal with them with a heavy hand, as he knows how to do,” he told AFP. ‘Very thankful’ From Trump Heights, Israeli artillery could be heard pounding its northern neighbour on Friday morning, after four Israeli soldiers were killed the previous night. By late afternoon, a US official said Israel and Hezbollah had agreed a ceasefire that began at 4:00pm local time (1300 GMT), brokered by US and Qatari mediators following talks with Israel and Iran. “When someone does something good for you, you’re not gonna hate them right when they do something you agree a little less with,” Dalia Ben Shabbat, a 38-year-old resident of Trump Heights, told AFP. “Regarding President Trump himself, we’re very thankful for what he’s done for Israel until now,” the architecture student and mother-of-four said. Hours before the US-Iran deal was announced earlier this week, Trump excoriated Netanyahu for launching attacks in Lebanon that threatened to derail it. “He’s a very difficult guy,” Trump said of Netanyahu, “and to be honest with you, he should be very thankful to us for doing this. Because if Iran had a nuclear weapon, Israel wouldn’t be around for two hours.” On Thursday, US Vice President JD Vance also issued an extraordinary rebuke to Israeli critics of the Iran deal, warning them not to alienate their “only powerful ally” left in the world. “Donald J. Trump is the only head of state in the entire world who is sympathetic to the nation of Israel at this moment in time, and he happens to be the head of state of the world superpower,” Vance said. But in Trump Heights, emblazoned with Israeli and US flags, residents didn’t take the comments by the US executive to heart. “If the person is good, the person is good,” Ben Shabbat said of the US president. ‘Vichy deal’ Trump Heights, which sits in the Israeli-annexed Golan Heights, is an homage to Donald Trump, who in 2019 recognised Israel’s sovereignty over the strategic plateau, making the US the first, and so far only, country to do so. While the community didn’t seem to have fully abandoned the US president, some residents voiced strong disappointment about his deal with Iran. “This deal is the equivalent of Vichy France making a deal with Nazi Germany,” one middle-aged man in a wheelchair who declined to be named said, referring to France’s World War II government, which collaborated with the Nazis to send Jews to concentration camps. A teenager who said he had been out of school for the last two months because of the war said he felt the deal didn’t take into account Israelis living near Lebanon. “If there is a ceasefire with Iran, people in central and south Israel will stop receiving Iranian missiles, but here in the north we will still have Hezbollah rockets,” he said.

    Dawn – HomeThe Straits Times – World

Okumaya devam et

ilgili gelişmeler