İçeriğe atla
Hikayeler
PK
Kapatıldı

Kriketçilerden Başbakan'a: İmran Han'ın Tedavisi Yüksek Mahkeme Kararına Uygun Olsun

Özet · AI üretimi

Uluslararası kriket camiasından 22 isim, aralarında 21 eski kaptanın da bulunduğu bir mektupla Pakistan Başbakanı Şahbaz Şerif'e başvurdu. Mektupta, eski başbakan İmran Han'ın tıbbi tedavisinin Yüksek Mahkeme'nin son direktifleri doğrultusunda yapılması talep edildi. Yüksek Mahkeme 18 Ağustos'ta hükümete, İmran Han'ın İslamabad'daki özel Şifa Uluslararası Hastanesi'ne nakledilmesi yönünde talimat vermişti. ESPN Cricinfo'nun Pazar günü bildirdiğine göre mektup bu karara atıf yapıyor. Bu çağrı, İmran Han'ın sağlık durumu ve tedavi koşullarına ilişkin tartışmaların sürdüğü bir dönemde geldi. Eski kriketçilerin müdahalesi, konunun uluslararası kamuoyunda da yakından izlendiğini gösteriyor.

Başlangıç 23 Ağu 16:51 4 olay Güncellendi 27 Ağu
Pakistan dosyası →
Paylaş
Bağlam · AI üretimi

Bağlam, hikayenin etrafındaki ülke + lider + komşu hikaye ağına dayanılarak AI tarafından üretildi. Olgu içerikleri için her zaman üstteki kaynak linklerine başvurun.

Bu gündemi takip et

Pakistan gelişmelerini kaçırma — ücretsiz kaydol, günlük brifinginde gör.

Bu gündeme tepki ver:

Zaman çizelgesi

en güncel: 27 Ağu
  1. Siyasi23 Ağu 16:51

    Cricket greats appeal to PM Shehbaz for Imran's treatment in line with Supreme Court directives

    Islamabad, Pakistan

    Twenty-two international cricketers, including 21 ex-captains, have written a letter to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, making an appeal for ex-Pakistani premier Imran Khan’s medical treatment in line with recent Supreme Court directives, ESPN Cricinfo reported on Sunday. On August 18, the Supreme Court directed the government to move Imran to Islamabad’s Shifa International Hospital, a private facility, within two days for examination and treatment by a multidisciplinary medical board. However, it later turned out that Imran was instead taken to the government-run Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (Pims). Meanwhile, it was also reported that he could not undergo a recommended computed tomography angiography (CTA) at Pims as the required facilities were unavailable at the hospital. The letter written by the 22 ex-cricketers and cited by ESPN Cricinfo stated: “Pakistan’s Supreme Court ordered that Imran Khan be transferred to hospital for examination by a medical board that was to include his own personal physicians and his sister, Dr Uzma Khan. “The court also reinstated weekly family visits. These were very welcome steps.” However, the former cricketers noted, Imran’s hospital stay lasted only a few hours. “He was examined by a state-appointed team rather than the board the court had directed, declared ‘medically fit’, and returned to Adiala Jail before that board could complete its work,” the letter claimed, according to ESPN Cricinfo. The former cricketers called for: Permitting the medical board directed by the Supreme Court — including Imran’s own doctors — to complete a full and independent assessment of his health, particularly the reported loss of vision in his right eye. Honouring the weekly family visits reinstated by the court without interruption or administrative delay Providing the recommended treatment to Imran without delay following the outcome of his medical assessment The letter’s signatories included Michael Atherton, Alex Blackwell, Allan Border, Michael Brearley, Greg Chappell, Ian Chappell, Belinda Clark, Alastair Cook, Michael Gatting, Sunil Gavaskar, Lee Germon, Adam Gilchrist, David Gower, Kim Hughes, Nasser Hussain, Clive Lloyd, Kapil Dev, Arjuna Ranatunga, Andrew Strauss, Dilip Vengsarkar, Steve Waugh and John Wright. In their appeal, they said they were writing “not as politicians, but as former colleagues and rivals who share a bond forged on the cricket field“ and that they did not seek to adjudicate Pakistan’s domestic legal processes. Several of these cricketers had called on the authorities in February as well, expressing “deep concern” about Imran’s treatment and prison conditions. The cricket greats had urged the Pakistan government to ensure immediate and adequate medical attention, dignified treatment, and unhindered access to legal processes for Imran. Imran has been in jail since August 2023, convicted in a string of cases that he says were politically driven following his ouster in a 2022 parliamentary vote. There has been much ado over his health in recent months, with him having been taken to the hospital multiple times for an eye ailment — right central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) — that came to light in late January. Meanwhile, his party, the PTI, and the government have been engaged in a blame game, with the former accusing the latter of a lack of transparency in not ensuring appropriate treatment for Imran.

    Dawn – Home
  2. Siyasi23 Ağu 17:34

    Cricket greats appeal to PM Shehbaz for Imran's medical treatment in line with SC directives

    Islamabad, Pakistan

    Twenty-two international cricketers, including 21 ex-captains, have written a letter to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, making an appeal for ex-Pakistani premier Imran Khan’s medical treatment in line with recent Supreme Court directives, ESPN Cricinfo reported on Sunday. On August 18, the Supreme Court directed the government to move Imran to Islamabad’s Shifa International Hospital, a private facility, within two days for examination and treatment by a multidisciplinary medical board. However, it later turned out that Imran was instead taken to the government-run Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (Pims). Meanwhile, it was also reported that he could not undergo a recommended computed tomography angiography (CTA) at Pims as the required facilities were unavailable at the hospital. The letter written by the 22 ex-cricketers and cited by ESPN Cricinfo stated: “Pakistan’s Supreme Court ordered that Imran Khan be transferred to hospital for examination by a medical board that was to include his own personal physicians and his sister, Dr Uzma Khan. “The court also reinstated weekly family visits. These were very welcome steps.” However, the former cricketers noted, Imran’s hospital stay lasted only a few hours. “He was examined by a state-appointed team rather than the board the court had directed, declared ‘medically fit’, and returned to Adiala Jail before that board could complete its work,” the letter claimed, according to ESPN Cricinfo. The former cricketers called for: Permitting the medical board directed by the Supreme Court — including Imran’s own doctors — to complete a full and independent assessment of his health, particularly the reported loss of vision in his right eye. Honouring the weekly family visits reinstated by the court without interruption or administrative delay Providing the recommended treatment to Imran without delay following the outcome of his medical assessment The letter’s signatories included Michael Atherton, Alex Blackwell, Allan Border, Michael Brearley, Greg Chappell, Ian Chappell, Belinda Clark, Alastair Cook, Michael Gatting, Sunil Gavaskar, Lee Germon, Adam Gilchrist, David Gower, Kim Hughes, Nasser Hussain, Clive Lloyd, Kapil Dev, Arjuna Ranatunga, Andrew Strauss, Dilip Vengsarkar, Steve Waugh and John Wright. In their appeal, they said they were writing “not as politicians, but as former colleagues and rivals who share a bond forged on the cricket field“ and that they did not seek to adjudicate Pakistan’s domestic legal processes. Several of these cricketers had called on the authorities in February as well, expressing “deep concern” about Imran’s treatment and prison conditions. The cricket greats had urged the Pakistan government to ensure immediate and adequate medical attention, dignified treatment, and unhindered access to legal processes for Imran. Imran has been in jail since August 2023, convicted in a string of cases that he says were politically driven following his ouster in a 2022 parliamentary vote. There has been much ado over his health in recent months, with him having been taken to the hospital multiple times for an eye ailment — right central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) — that came to light in late January. Meanwhile, his party, the PTI, and the government have been engaged in a blame game, with the former accusing the latter of a lack of transparency in not ensuring appropriate treatment for Imran.

    Dawn – Home
  3. Siyasi25 Ağu 13:07

    Opposition, govt spar in Senate over Imran Khan’s medical treatment

    Islamabad, Pakistan

    ISLAMABAD: The opposition and the government on Tuesday sparred in the Senate over the treatment of PTI founder and former premier Imran Khan in hospital, with both sides accusing each other of contempt of a Supreme Court (SC) order. On August 18, the apex court ordered the government to shift the PTI founder to the Shifa International Hospital in Islamabad and to constitute a medical board, including his sister and personal physician. However, instead of shifting Imran to the Shifa Hospital, the government took him to the Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (Pims), citing security concerns and shifted him back to the Adiala jail after the medical board declared him medically fit. The PTI and Imran’s family have been accusing the government of not implementing the SC’s order of shifting him to Shifa Hospital. The heated argument broke out on Tuesday after presiding officer Shahadat Awan disallowed the opposition from moving a resolution concerning the implementation of the SC’s order regarding Imran’s medical treatment at Shifa International Hospital, but allowed discussion on points of order. The opposition slammed the government for what it called “throwing the binding orders of the SC in the dustbin”, while the government insisted that it was for the court to determine whether the verdict had been implemented. The session, chaired by PPP Senator Shahadat Awan, ruled that the matter was sub judice and could only be raised through a point of order, not a resolution. PTI parliamentary leader Barrister Ali Zafar, who sought to move a resolution, said the Senate must uphold the “supremacy of the Constitution” and reaffirm its commitment to implementing SC orders. Speaking on the floor of the house, Zafar cited the SC’s Aug 18 order directing the authorities to take Imran to Shifa International Hospital for treatment and constitute a medical board. “Neither was he taken to Shifa Hospital nor was a board constituted. Even a machine to check his heart was not available at Pims,” Zafar alleged. “Can any government refuse to implement a Supreme Court order? No, it cannot,” he said, referring to Articles 190 and 204 of the Constitution, which make compliance with court orders binding and non-compliance contempt of court. “You may oppose Imran Khan’s politics. Do that. But do not play politics with his health,” he added. “Governments come and go, but the Constitution remains.” PTI Senator Azam Swati accused the government of double standards. “When someone has to be given a benefit, relief is provided in judicial matters. Institutions were sent to Islamabad airport to give relief to Nawaz Sharif,” he said. Responding on behalf of the government, Adviser to the Prime Minister Rana Sanaullah said the state was “subject to the Constitution” and had complied with the SC order. “The court also said security arrangements would be assessed by the administration. Given the law and order situation, he was taken to a government hospital where qualified doctors were available,” he said. Sanaullah said a doctors’ panel had examined the PTI founder and declared his health “satisfactory”, after which he was sent back to jail. “The matter is before the court. The report will be submitted on Sept 16. Let the court examine it and decide whether the order was implemented.” He questioned why the opposition was “determined to prove him ill” when his own doctors and family had said he was in good health. “Do not do politics on health. If you are telling us not to, then you should also refrain,” he said. Senate Opposition Leader Allama Raja Nasir Abbas called on the government to show “magnanimity” and implement the court order “in letter and spirit”. He proposed that a Senate committee be formed to visit the jail. “Politics and politicians are being crushed. Who will run the country then? It is not too late. There is no benefit in contempt of court,” he said.

    Dawn – Pakistan
  4. Siyasi27 Ağu 10:00

    Imran's hospital visit: Ex-PM's sister again moves SC for early hearing of contempt plea against govt

    Islamabad, Pakistan

    ISLAMABAD: Jailed former premier Imran Khan’s sister, Uzma Khan, submitted a second application to the Supreme Court on Thursday for the early hearing of a contempt petition against government functionaries accused of flouting the Supreme Court (SC) directive to shift the PTI founder to Islamabad’s Shifa International Hospital. On August 18, a three-member SC bench issued several directives on pleas concerning Imran’s health and instructed authorities to move him to Shifa International Hospital, a private facility. However, the government instead took the PTI founder to Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (Pims), a government hospital, for a check-up and then transported him back to the prison. On Tuesday, Uzma filed the contempt plea against government functionaries and an application for its early hearing. But, the court fixed September 16 to hear the case. The fresh application, filed through Advocate Uzair Karamat Bhandari, sought the initiation of contempt proceedings against government functionaries within the present or early next week. It stated that the contempt plea was meant to ensure the immediate implementation of the Aug 18 order. The early hearing would “serve the interest of justice, protection of life and health and due enforcement” of the SC orders, the application said. It added that the subject matter of the petition concerned the life, health, dignity and physical well-being of “a national hero and a former prime minister”, whose health was deteriorating and whose life was stated to be in jeopardy. It was unclear whether the decision to hear the matter on Sept 16 constituted directions by the competent authority/ the chief justice, or simply the “noting of the registrar which has been placed before the competent authority for consideration”. The application pleaded that if the former was true, the decision to fix the case on Sept 16 be reconsidered and the matter be fixed for hearing expeditiously, either this week or as early as possible next week. “The present case is unique on its facts and in the manner in which the Aug 18 order of this court has been brazenly flouted,” the application stated, adding that it had brought the governance and judicial systems of the country into international focus. “Any further delay in hearing of the contempt petition may cause serious and irreparable harm,” it argued. The application stated that the reasons set out for not fixing the contempt plea early could not justify such a long delay in the hearing of the case. Earlier, the SC office had said that an early hearing of the contempt petition was not possible in view of the fact that there were 94 separate original criminal petitions of the same category pending before the court. The office had said that the fixation policy required that cases be fixed for hearing on their turn in the relevant category, and it was unlikely that the turn of the contempt case would come up. Since the main case relating to Imran’s health was pending on Sept 16, the contempt plea may also be taken on the same date, the office had decided. But, Uzma’s fresh application argued that there was nothing in the SC’s fixation policy preventing the immediate fixation of the contempt petition, and that in fact the policy “clearly prioritises” matters related to liberty — “especially where they arise due to non-compliance of court orders”. Highlighting that the policy allowed the chief justice to pass orders for early fixation of the hearing, it said the applicant had “a strong prima facie case and the balance of convenience lies entirely in favour of early fixation”. The application contended that no prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the matter was heard at the earliest, whereas delay could cause “irreparable loss and injury”.

    Dawn – Home

Okumaya devam et

ilgili gelişmeler